I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Indonesia has freed and deported a US man after he spent 11 years in prison for the premeditated murder of his then girlfriend’s mother on the tourist island of Bali, and he will now faces federal charges in the US.
，详情可参考WPS官方版本下载
本条第二款第三项、第四项所称货物，是指构成不动产实体的材料和设备，包括建筑装饰材料和给排水、采暖、卫生、通风、照明、通讯、燃气、消防、中央空调、电梯、电气、光伏发电、智能化楼宇设备及配套设施等。
Ранее стало известно, что в результате взрыва пострадали два человека — 14-летняя девочка и ее 50-летний отец. Медики оказывают им всю необходимую помощь.